Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- cloud:aws:big_data:glue [2023/10/19 06:47] – skipidar
+++ cloud:aws:big_data:glue [2023/11/01 07:13] (current) – ↷ Page moved from business_process_management:camunda:cloud:aws:big_data:glue to cloud:aws:big_data:glue skipidar
@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
-===Advantages of **AWS Glue**:===
+"AWS EMR" is a direct competitor of "AWS Glue"
+===Advantages of AWS Glue:===
 **1. Serverless Architecture**: AWS Glue is a fully managed, serverless ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) service. It abstracts the underlying infrastructure, making it easier to use and manage, while also reducing operational overhead.
@@ Line 31: / Line 34: @@
+===Summary:===
+In summary, **AWS Glue is a more suitable** choice when you want a **fully managed**, serverless ETL service with a focus on simplifying data preparation and transformation, and when you have sporadic or less complex data processing needs.
-In summary, AWS Glue is a more suitable choice when you want a fully managed, serverless ETL service with a focus on simplifying data preparation and transformation, and when you have sporadic or less complex data processing needs. AWS EMR, on the other hand, is ideal for highly customized, complex big data processing tasks that require a high degree of control and support for various big data frameworks. The choice between them depends on your specific use case and requirements.
+AWS **EMR, on the other hand**, is **ideal for highly customized, complex big data processing tasks** that require a **high degree of control and support for various big data frameworks**. The choice between them depends on your specific use case and requirements.